Stop reading AI diffs. Start reading verification proofs.

When agents write fifteen hundred lines in two minutes, reading every line is impossible. KaaS Review collapses the diff and puts a one-page receipt on top of each pull request.

Book a scoping call

Run by the founder, a former Head of Software Engineering.

Your CI
  1. Every pull request

  2. Your rules

  3. One receipt

  4. Your reviewer

Why review became the bottleneck

Engineers now spend more of the job reading code than writing it. Most teams still review the way they did before the agents arrived.

  1. Every agent pull request lands on the same few seniors. Writing code got cheap. Reading it still takes a senior, so the work piles up on the people who know the system best.

  2. Most of their notes are the same notes. A missing test, the wrong style, a helper that already exists. Senior attention goes on what a written rule could catch.

  3. Prompt and agent changes merge with no check at all. A reworded prompt can break a flow that worked yesterday, and nothing in the pipeline notices until a customer does.

KaaS Review turns those repeat notes into rules your CI checks on every pull request.

What changes for your reviewers

Two checks run on every pull request. Both are written from your codebase.

  1. Review agent

    KaaS Review on checkout/log.ts

    logger.info("saved card", { card })

    no_card_data_in_logs Card numbers never reach a log line. Log the card id instead.

    From review/rules.md

    Seniors see only the intent questions. The review agent comments against your rules, and the coding agent fixes what it can before a person looks.

    A note made twice becomes a rule. It goes into review/rules.md, and the review agent applies it on every pull request after that.

  2. Regression suite

    Refund summary prompt reworded

    Refund under the limitSame answer

    Refund with a gift cardSame answer

    Refund across two currenciesAnswer changed

    A reworded prompt cannot quietly break a flow. Saved cases run whenever a prompt or agent changes, and merge waits on any case that now answers differently.

  3. Your team

    A person approves

    Merge

    A person still approves every merge. The checks comment, and your team merges.

A senior engineer scans a huge diff, points at naming, misses the race in the last file and approves out of fatigue.

They read a short receipt of proofs, then spend their attention where the checks flag a doubt.

How KaaS Review lands in your repo

It is part of the Transformation, and you keep every file it leaves behind.

  1. Agree the receipt.

    We choose what a receipt must show with your tech leads.

    You hold the receipt format.

  2. Run it on one repo.

    A check in your CI builds the receipt for each pull request.

    You hold the first ten receipts.

  3. Tune the rules.

    Reviewers mark what the receipt missed, and the rules change.

    You hold rules that improve with use.

“You work with the person who does the work. No handoff, no juniors, no account manager.”

Paramanantham HarrisonFounder, KaaS.team

  1. Former Head of Software Engineering
  2. 14 years building production software

Questions teams ask before they book

Do you need write access?

The check runs in your CI and comments on pull requests. It needs no more than a bot would.

Does it replace human review?

No. It moves human review from reading syntax to judging proofs.

Which agents does it work with?

Any agent that opens a pull request, including Claude Code.

What if we stop?

The workflow file stays in your repo and keeps running.

What is fixed before we start

  1. Fit check first. If we're not the right team, we'll say so on the call.

  2. You get a written scope and a fixed quote before anything starts.

  3. Everything we build stays in your cloud and your repo when we finish.

  4. Continuous Care is optional, and stopping it changes nothing that already works.

  5. Bring your largest recent pull request to the call and we walk it into a receipt.

Bring us the bottleneck.

Bring your largest recent pull request to the call and we walk it into a receipt.

  1. Spec
  2. Build
  3. ReviewWaits here
  4. Release
Where work is stuck
Spec, build, review or release: wherever changes wait longest.
What exists today
The AI tools your teams use and the rules around them, if any.
What the next quarter needs
The launch or deadline the work has to hit.
  1. 1

    Call

    We find where the work waits and whether we can help.

  2. 2

    Fixed scope

    You get a written scope and a fixed quote before anything starts.

  3. 3

    Kickoff

    Work starts with your product and engineering leads.

If we're not the right fit, we'll say so.

Pick a time

Open the calendar and choose any free slot. You get an invite with a video link.

Rather write first? Send a note