The board does not care about tokens. They care about features shipped.
Teams spend heavily on coding agents without knowing if software ships faster. KaaS Pulse tracks the delivery path from ticket to production.
Run by the founder, a former Head of Software Engineering.
Why nobody can prove the agents paid off
Leadership hears opinions about the agents and sees no rows to check them against.
Speed gets measured where it does not matter. Lines written and prompts sent go up. The release date doesn’t move, and leadership notices.
Spend and delivery live in different places. The bill sits with finance, the deploys sit in the pipeline, and nobody joins the two.
The report only shows what went well. So leadership discounts all of it, the real gains included.
KaaS Pulse joins spend and delivery in one quarterly report that keeps every row, the ones that got worse included.
What leadership gets each quarter
Three sources you already own feed one report. Nobody fills in a survey or logs hours.
Your pipeline and repoReleases, lead time, failed changes, recovery, review wait
Your gateway logAgent spend by team, model and shipped change
Your checksEval results for prompts and agents
One quarterly reportAcme Inc
- One report leadership reads in one sitting.Every row has a direction, what happened and what changes next.
- Agent spend next to what shipped.Spend per shipped change sits beside the delivery rows, read from your gateway log.
- Red rows that stay red.A row that got worse stays in, with the next change named.
- Numbers from tools you already run.Releases, lead time, failed changes, recovery and review wait come from your pipeline and repo. Eval results come from your checks.
You defend the tooling budget with lines of code while releases stay flat.
You show the board where work waits and what removing the wait did to releases.
How KaaS Pulse lands in your repo
It is part of the Transformation, and you keep every file it leaves behind.
Connect git.
Read access to history and pull requests is enough.
You hold a first report from past data.
Add the spend.
Gateway and sandbox logs join the picture.
You hold cost per epic.
Review monthly.
The report shows red rows as well as green.
You hold a record you can show.
“You work with the person who does the work. No handoff, no juniors, no account manager.”
Paramanantham HarrisonFounder, KaaS.team
- Former Head of Software Engineering
- 14 years building production software
Questions teams ask before they book
Do you need write access?
No. Pulse reads git and your delivery tools.
Is there a number I can quote?
Only your own. The report shows your repo before and after, never an industry average.
Which agents does it work with?
Any, including Claude Code. It reads the result, not the tool.
What if we stop?
Your reports and the queries behind them stay yours.
What is fixed before we start
Fit check first. If we're not the right team, we'll say so on the call.
You get a written scope and a fixed quote before anything starts.
Everything we build stays in your cloud and your repo when we finish.
Continuous Care is optional, and stopping it changes nothing that already works.
Bring the budget question your CFO asked to the call.
Bring us the bottleneck.
Bring the budget question your CFO asked to the call.
- Spec
- Build
- ReviewWaits here
- Release
- Where work is stuck
- Spec, build, review or release: wherever changes wait longest.
- What exists today
- The AI tools your teams use and the rules around them, if any.
- What the next quarter needs
- The launch or deadline the work has to hit.
- 1
Call
We find where the work waits and whether we can help.
- 2
Fixed scope
You get a written scope and a fixed quote before anything starts.
- 3
Kickoff
Work starts with your product and engineering leads.
If we're not the right fit, we'll say so.
Pick a time
Open the calendar and choose any free slot. You get an invite with a video link.